![]() ![]() ![]() The only information in the public domain should be "This is submarine, it displaces tons, carries sailors and officers, and it is a happy boat" The future captain will have to work extra hard to ensure he can outfox the PLAN and PN, and work with the assumption PN/PLAN know much more about his boat than he does about theirs. We have to assume 24000 pages have reduced the sub's capability by 30 to 40%. The bottom line is that our depleted sub arm just got torpedoed. Please tell me, just how much "commercial" information about INS Arihant would you be comfortable placing in the public domain? Assuming that the redaction was done by the press, then the fully exposed document was changing hands - How many people saw it / copied it/ stored it / uploaded it on torrent/ analysed it / printed it and then used it for their chana masala cone? How many of those chaps have now approached ISI?Īs for others that say that the information is commercially available and still more critical information like acoustic signatures and weapons information is safe - Who are they kidding? It is like saying "yes, 90% of the information is lost, but we still have 10%". Who lay their eyes on the document before it was redacted? Who applied the black ink and when? The document ping ponged between multiple parties before it reached the press in Australia. Saying that critical information was redacted is useless. Frankly, IN and MoD are trying to search for a fig leaf. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |